A Small Introduction to Soccer

Want to learn how to play soccer? Well you have come to the right place. To become a good soccer player you need to master several skills. You can not just focus on a single jurisdiction, instead, you must also have other good skills as a good control over the ball or quality passes.

You always tend to improve your skills soccer because there is always something you can improve your game So, we'll take a look at major way of playing soccer skills that you need to master soccer player.

How to play soccer - Courses A training describes how soccer players in a soccer team are positioned on the ground. Different formations are used from match to match depending on the skill of your opponents. If your opponents are ultra defensive then, of course, a more offensive formation as 4-3-3 is preferable.

But if your opponents are ultra an offensive 4-4-2 formation that is more preferable. For example, describes the 4-4-2 formation to play with 4 defenders, 4 midfielders and two forwards / centers, and is the most widely used in the formation of soccer today.

How to Play Soccer - dribble In soccer, dribble is one of the most difficult to master skills but also one of the most useful attacking moves. In a game typical of soccer, you and your teammates try to propel the ball toward your opponent's goal under the different ball, dribble, such as your adversaries.

If you master the art of dribbling will be quite difficult to stop and opponents will be unsuccessful tackles on you which will result in useful free kicks and even penalty kicks.

How to Play Soccer - Topic To dominate the game in the air you must have good skills category. Heading can be painful at the beginning because you have to hit the ball with the right side of your head.

Soccer Free Kick Guide

There are several types of soccer free kick methods that you need to recognize as soccer player. In this guide we will clarify what each of these mean and how you can take advantage of them. Let’s start…

In soccer, there are two main types of free kicks; a direct free kick (you may shoot directly at the goal) and indirect free kick (one of your teammates need to touch the ball first before you kick it). Penalty kick is also a type of free kick that you will need to face as soccer player.

The most common type of soccer free kick is called direct free kick. Some people claim that a direct free kick is like a penalty kick. If performed right it is a great chance for scoring. However, scoring from a direct free kick will require many hours of practice and you really need to have patience while learning it.

When performing a free kick it is not necessary to have the hardest shoot in your team. What is more important is to have good accuracy. A hard shooting player rarely manages to hit the goal because a shoot with big force is hard to control. The best free kicks are performed by using the half instep which is a technique that is used by Juninho, Pirlo and Cristiano.R. If you really want to become a good direct free kick taker, than the half instep technique is the way to go.

An indirect free kick is also a great chance for scoring a goal. As already mentioned in the beginning of this article, one of your teammates needs to touch the ball first. One strategy for performing an indirect free kick is to pass the ball to another free teammate. Make your opponents think that you are the kick taker.

As soon as your teammate passes the ball to you the opponents will runs towards the ball and try to block the kick. What you should do then is to tap the ball gently to one of your non-marked teammates. If performed correctly you will be noted for one assist :-) During an indirect free kick you should try to keep yourself calm and try to find the best solution for the current situation.

One way for becoming good on all types of free kicks is to practice 30 min extra after every soccer practice. If you are not the regular free kick taker in your team you should still practice on your free kick. Soon or later you will get the chance to show what you can.

Why the U.S. stumbled at the World Cup.(Direct Kick; women's soccer)

WHEN PEOPLE WONDER what happened to the U.S. at the 2003 Women's World Cup, the first thing to consider is that the best team won. Germany was the most dynamic and mentally tough side at the Cup. Germany's 3-0 win over the U.S. wasn't as emphatic as the score would suggest--it padded the result with two stop page-time, counterattacking goals--yet it was dearly the better team. Ironically, it was the fruit of the U.S.'s 1999 World Cup success, the WUSA, that allowed Germany and others to so effortlessly bridge the quality gap between themselves and the sport's traditional powers. So while the national teams from Norway and China caught early planes home, those from Canada, Germany, and Sweden advanced to the semifinals. And while Germany and Sweden were battling for the Cup, U.S. stars such as Mia Hamm, Brandi Chastain, and Julie Foudy were stopping by the on-site makeshift TV studio and nostalgically recalling the familial nature of the U.S. team and claiming that professional women's soccer would make a comeback. The WUSA was so effective at developing the on-field skills of the Germans, Swedes, and others that it may have sealed its own fate. Were the U.S. to have won--or even advanced to--the World Cup championship match, the sport may have captured at least a fraction of the attention that it earned in 1999. Instead, few people even knew who was competing in the Cup finals. Some pundits blamed the suspension of the WUSA and the pall that it cast over the U.S. team for America's woes. But if anything, that should have stoked the U.S. players' fire. The reasons why the U.S. lost are instead more tactical and physical than mental. Among them: * Loyalty. For too many years, the core U.S. stars commanded roster spots and playing time that could have been used to develop younger players. When it came to selecting the U.S. World Cup roster, so few qualified players had been bloodied that coach April Heinrichs even selected an eventual starter, Shannon Boxx, who hadn't yet earned a single cap. Selection problems continued when injured vets Shannon MacMillan and Danielle Slaton were brought back into the fold even though neither was ready to compete at a World Cup level. * Age. Some of the U.S. vets have lost a step or two, and it showed. Tellingly, after Mia Hamm was rested--something that would have been unthinkable four years ago--she never regained the momentum she enjoyed in the team's opening two games. * Poor preparation. The U.S. spent its pre-tournament training playing against weak nations such as Ireland and Costa Rica. That isn't going to cut it--especially now that the U.S. doesn't awe its opposition simply by stepping onto the field. * Tactics. Between odd substitution choices and a bizarre insistence on playing an outdated formation, Heindrichs did herself no favors. * A lack of skill. The U.S. has turned from a lithe, crisp-passing team to a physical bruising one that lives and dies on opportunism and set pieces. (Only two of the U.S.'s 12 WWC goals were scored in the run of play.) Cindy Parlow started the U.S.'s trend toward physical play, but the development of Boxx and 6'0" Abby Wambach made it law. As a result the U.S. was matched in skill by second-tier nations, and when it competed against another physical side, it lacked the speed and combination play necessary to control the game. The Olympics are next for the U.S., and things aren't going to get any easier. The U.S.'s lack of experienced, young, skillful internationals likely means that the team is going to have to battle for any accolades it earns in the foreseeable future. Unfortunately, the days of Harem, Foudy, Chastain, and company are practically over as well. Without those household names, starting a new women's league will be a difficult task, to say the least. After the 1999 Women's World Cup finals, the love affair with and respect afforded the U.S. team lasted throughout the rest of year, resulting in both the team being named Sports Illustrated's Sportswomen of the Year and the creation of the WUSA. After the 2003 Women's World Cup, ABC couldn't end the event quickly enough, cutting away from the broadcast before the trophy presentation. Unfortunately, most of the country and any potential WUSA investors had likely already long abandoned the Cup, tuning out after the U.S.'s semifinals loss.

Articles from Soccer Digest